# Comparison-page evidence worksheet.: multi-channel AEO activation pack Canonical guide: https://hireeli.io/resources/comparison-page-evidence-template Primary unbranded question: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? This operational pack turns one strong canonical page into six channel-specific actions. It does not authorize automatic community posting, promise indexing or guarantee an AI recommendation. Reddit contributions and third-party outreach remain human-final. ## 1. Owned website, ChatGPT search, Google and Gemini Asset ID: comparison-page-evidence-template-owned-prompt-refresh Objective: Keep one canonical answer current for the unbranded buyer question: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? - Canonical URL: https://hireeli.io/resources/comparison-page-evidence-template - Opening answer to preserve: A comparison evidence worksheet should record each vendor's positioning, target audience, official pricing, monitored providers, action workflow, publishing boundary, verification method, strengths, limitations and best-fit scenario. Every factual row needs a current official URL and literal support. Unsupported review themes, migration claims and customer outcomes must not be invented. - Prompt-led heading: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? - Supporting decisions: How should competitor strengths be presented? | How often should comparison facts be reviewed? - Evidence to retain: Google Search Central: guidance on generative AI content | Google Search Central: AI features and your website | Peec AI documentation - Refresh rule: update this URL when facts, product behavior or buyer criteria change. Do not create another page for a cosmetic wording variation. - Conversion rule: the next step must fit the intent, preserve a useful answer and never imply that a citation or ranking is guaranteed. Owner: ____________________ Status: [ ] research [ ] drafted [ ] approved [ ] published [ ] verified Public receipt or URL: ____________________ ## 2. Reddit and ChatGPT discovery Asset ID: comparison-page-evidence-template-reddit-contribution Objective: Find a real discussion where first-hand experience can improve the answer to: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? - Start with two community universes. ICP candidates: r/SaaS, r/marketing, r/startups. Problem-universe query: site:reddit.com "What evidence does a competitor comparison page need?". These are research candidates, not automatic posting targets. - Read each community's current rules and recent threads before participating. Do not post the same answer across communities. - Contribution angle: explain competitor source-of-truth fields, show the tradeoff behind decision fields, and name when comparison rows changes the recommendation. - Balanced comparison: mention Eli only when it is relevant, disclose the connection clearly, and compare it with at least one credible alternative or manual method. - Useful proof: offer the decision framework directly in the comment. Link to https://hireeli.io/resources/comparison-page-evidence-template only when the link adds evidence the comment cannot reasonably contain. - Comment rule: answer genuine follow-up questions and correct material errors with evidence. Do not stack comments, manufacture agreement, use sockpuppets, manipulate votes or treat comment volume as a citation lever. - Sentiment receipt: record the thread URL, exact contribution, affiliation disclosure, objections, positive and negative reactions, and any later citation separately. - Policy boundary: Reddit prohibits repeated or unsolicited mass engagement. Every contribution in this pack is human-final and community-specific. Owner: ____________________ Status: [ ] research [ ] drafted [ ] approved [ ] published [ ] verified Public receipt or URL: ____________________ ## 3. YouTube, transcripts and multi-modal retrieval Asset ID: comparison-page-evidence-template-youtube-prompt-script Objective: Publish one answer-first video whose title uses the real prompt instead of clickbait: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? - Working title: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? - Opening 20 seconds: A comparison evidence worksheet should record each vendor's positioning, target audience, official pricing, monitored providers, action workflow, publishing boundary, verification method, strengths, limitations and best-fit scenario. Every factual row needs a current official URL and literal support. Unsupported review themes, migration claims and customer outcomes must not be invented. - Chapter 1: Competitor source-of-truth fields - Chapter 2: Decision fields - Chapter 3: Comparison rows - Buyer follow-ups to say aloud: How should competitor strengths be presented? | How often should comparison facts be reviewed? - Description: summarize the decision, link to https://hireeli.io/resources/comparison-page-evidence-template with campaign tags, list named sources, and state the review date. - Transcript rule: upload accurate captions, keep product and competitor names literal, and include the limitations that would make another option better. Owner: ____________________ Status: [ ] research [ ] drafted [ ] approved [ ] published [ ] verified Public receipt or URL: ____________________ ## 4. Independent websites, partners and Perplexity Asset ID: comparison-page-evidence-template-third-party-authority Objective: Earn independent corroboration for the decision around: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? - Pitch angle: give an editor, partner or practitioner a useful framework for create balanced competitor pages with current source-backed facts, supported by real observations or product evidence they can verify. - Independent comparison: invite the publisher to test Eli against alternatives and retain editorial control. Do not require a positive conclusion or prescribed wording. - Evidence bundle: Google Search Central: guidance on generative AI content: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/using-gen-ai-content | Google Search Central: AI features and your website: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features | Peec AI documentation: https://docs.peec.ai/intro-to-peec-ai - Original input to add before outreach: one anonymized buyer-question pattern, one screenshot or measured example, one limitation, and one falsifiable claim. - Destination when useful: https://hireeli.io/resources/comparison-page-evidence-template - Receipt: publisher, contact, pitch, response, published URL, disclosure, referral visits and observed citations. A placement is not a guaranteed recommendation. Owner: ____________________ Status: [ ] research [ ] drafted [ ] approved [ ] published [ ] verified Public receipt or URL: ____________________ ## 5. LinkedIn founder distribution Asset ID: comparison-page-evidence-template-linkedin-learning-post Objective: Turn the buyer question into a concise founder lesson without pretending LinkedIn reach equals AI visibility. - Hook: Most teams ask "What evidence does a competitor comparison page need?" too late. - Point 1: Competitor source-of-truth fields. - Point 2: Decision fields. - Point 3: Comparison rows. - Evidence line: cite one literal fact from Google Search Central: guidance on generative AI content and link to the source or the full methodology. - Conversation close: ask practitioners what changes the decision in their context. Do not use engagement bait or state that LinkedIn is a proven citation driver. - Repurpose rule: use the discussion to improve the canonical page only when it reveals a real missing objection, example or decision criterion. Owner: ____________________ Status: [ ] research [ ] drafted [ ] approved [ ] published [ ] verified Public receipt or URL: ____________________ ## 6. Attribution, citation monitoring and refresh Asset ID: comparison-page-evidence-template-measurement-refresh Objective: Measure discovery and citation decay for the exact unbranded question: What evidence does a competitor comparison page need? - Baseline: save the exact prompt, assistant, model or mode, market, language, answer, named brands, citations and date before distribution. - Direct traffic: preserve referral and campaign parameters for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google, YouTube, LinkedIn, partner sites and Reddit. - Self-reported attribution: ask "How did you first hear about Eli?" with named options for ChatGPT, Gemini or Google AI, Claude, Perplexity, Google Search, Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, colleague and other. - Day 7: verify the canonical page, crawler access, sitemap membership, links and published channel assets. - Day 14: inspect impressions, referrals and early discussion quality. Do not infer failure from a missing citation this early. - Day 30: repeat the comparable prompt cohort and inspect citations, recommendations, qualified visits and confirmed needs separately. - Day 45: review Reddit and third-party pickups. Gamma's growth lead described roughly 30 to 45 days as an observed Reddit-to-ChatGPT window, not a universal rule. - Day 90: treat citations as decaying inventory. Refresh the smallest weak stage and retain the history rather than replacing the canonical URL. Owner: ____________________ Status: [ ] research [ ] drafted [ ] approved [ ] published [ ] verified Public receipt or URL: ____________________ ## Shared rules - Start from the unbranded buyer question. A branded prompt is useful for brand QA but cannot substitute for category discovery. - One canonical page owns the answer. Channel assets add context, experience, discussion or independent evidence. - Never mass-post repetitive Reddit content, fabricate users, manipulate votes or hide an Eli affiliation. - Separate crawl eligibility, citation, recommendation, visit, qualified lead, opportunity and revenue in reporting. - Refresh from evidence. Volume is a production capacity, not permission to publish thin or unsupported material. ## Governing references - OpenAI Publishers and Developers FAQ: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/12627856-publishers-and-developers-faq - Google people-first content guidance: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content - Perplexity crawler documentation: https://docs.perplexity.ai/docs/resources/perplexity-crawlers - Anthropic crawler documentation: https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/8896518-does-anthropic-crawl-data-from-the-web-and-how-can-site-owners-block-the-crawler - Reddit spam policy: https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043504051-Spam